·
· · · ·
·
·
·
· ·
| · |
·
A Kinder, Gentler Nastygram · · · By Stevi Deter · · Much has been said about the level of viciousness on the net. · We flame each other ruthlessly on Usenet. We send nastygrams to · perpetrators of spam. The immediate and accepted response to · anything we determine to be idiocy is supposed to be an angry · missive. If you manage to work in some wit, youre ready for · talk.bizarre. · ·How often do we stop to think about how appropriate this · approach is? If we apply the golden · rule, are we all saying that we want to receive this kind of · treatment in return? Without straying too far into the · psychological, are we all detached enough from our net personas · that we are not only able to dish it out, but also take it? · ·Recently Ive had the chance to see that I, for one, · dont like to reap what I sow. I was webmaster for a week at · my company. That included the job of reading all the email to the · webmaster, answering what I could and forwarding the mail that · should have been sent to the support or sales departments. · ·I was taken aback by how many of those who wrote the webmaster · were just plain uncivil. Profanity, snide comments, threats - · they were all there. · ·Now, I recognize that the time were most likely to write · the webmaster is when something has bothered us. We couldnt · find the information we were looking for. A link was broken. The · search engine wasnt working. I am as guilty of anyone of · phrasing my anger in strident tones. I couldnt tell you how · many times Ive told webmasters that their site had lost my · business for their company and they were obviously overpaid. · ·In all that time, only one has written me back in an equally · nasty tone. My response was to consider learning who his manager · was, and forwarding the message, complaining that Id been · treated horribly by this representative of their company. · ·Then I realized how unfair I was being. Why do I have the · right to be rude, but my correspondent does not? This seems to be · widespread in our culture. Ive had several training session · in customer service. Theyve all spent a significant time · focusing on how to deal with the rude customer. Rude customers · are expected, and our job is to figure out how to defuse the · situation. Were taught how to listen to the customer, and · try to appease the customer. This is all in the name of retaining · the customer. · ·The thing is, it works. Ive found I get much better · customer service if I start the call, letter, or discussion · angry. Youve wronged me! Youve produced a horrible · product! You must calm me and appease me, no matter how · ridiculous my claims are! · ·In my experience, this approach works much better than just · calling up, acting like a rational adult, and calmly explaining · my problem. The only exception is when I get the extremely · hassled customer service representative who is just so grateful · that Im not yelling at him that hell bend over · backwards to keep me on the phone. Otherwise, the next call could · be another yeller. · ·We seem to have taken this attitude to an extreme on the net. · I see language that almost no one uses during a telephone call. · Ive seen absurd requests. "Your stupid ass file on the · ftp site broken. Recompile it and send me the fixed file when · its ready. You are all such idiots. I hope you go · bankrupt." I have to find a polite way to explain that the · file is indeed perfectly usable, its just that the user · needs to upgrade his version of Adobe · Acrobat Reader, which is, after all, free and available · everywhere. · ·Now this example shows the frustration that arises when the · user attacks full out over an issue that he could have corrected · himself. The problem is, these attacks create such a feeling of · frustration that when the webmaster discovers issues that were · legitimately the sites fault, she could care less. Just · quite yelling at me, for heavens sake. Im just the · backup webmaster! Mistakes happen! We have several thousand pages · that are updated by scores of people, and links will break, the · ftp server will be unavailable, and the site may not be organized · in the way that best suits you. Deal! · ·Which, of course, is not the best customer service attitude. · ·What I would suggest is a return to civility. If you find a · problem with a site, by all means, report it. Most people have no · idea how much work it takes to maintain a huge website, and all · the assistance you can give the webmaster is truly appreciated. · ·When you report the error, however, report it in the same way · you would if you were talking to someone you want to do something · for you. You dont have to kowtow, but you could use a · polite tone. Write a business letter, not a flame. The webmaster · didnt intend to ruin your day. The webmaster probably had · to throw up a correction to the page, answer some steaming hot · complaint letters, fix whatever issues they brought up, and then · attend a four hour planning meeting. The webmaster is a human · being who is probably overworked and doing a job that could keep · at least two more people occupied full time. · ·The net seems to be the incarnation of Hobbes' view · of the world: life is nasty, brutish, and the hub will crash · right when you need to find something. Perhaps we should inject a · little idealism into our interactions. Lets move towards a · little more Rousseau. · Lets establish a social contract, which includes the idea · that if you ask nicely, you shall receive, and if you flame, · dont complain when theres carbon on your dinner. · ·Be excellent to one another. Ill thank you for it the · next time I have to be webmaster. · · |
·
t h e n e t n e t
·
|
·
t h e g a l l e r y
·
|
·
m u s i c
·
|
·
f o o d & d r i n k
·
·
w e b s c h m e b
·
|
·
b o o k s t o r e
·
|
·
r e a d m e
·
|
·
f e e d b a c k
·
|
·
s u b m i t
·
·
·
·