· · · · · · Web Schmeb: A Kinder, Gentler Nastygram · · · ·

· · Web Schmeb ·

· · · · ·
  · A Kinder, Gentler Nastygram
·

· · By Stevi Deter · ·

Much has been said about the level of viciousness on the net. · We flame each other ruthlessly on Usenet. We send nastygrams to · perpetrators of spam. The immediate and accepted response to · anything we determine to be idiocy is supposed to be an angry · missive. If you manage to work in some wit, you’re ready for · talk.bizarre.

· ·

How often do we stop to think about how appropriate this · approach is? If we apply the golden · rule, are we all saying that we want to receive this kind of · treatment in return? Without straying too far into the · psychological, are we all detached enough from our net personas · that we are not only able to dish it out, but also take it?

· ·

Recently I’ve had the chance to see that I, for one, · don’t like to reap what I sow. I was webmaster for a week at · my company. That included the job of reading all the email to the · webmaster, answering what I could and forwarding the mail that · should have been sent to the support or sales departments.

· ·

I was taken aback by how many of those who wrote the webmaster · were just plain uncivil. Profanity, snide comments, threats - · they were all there.

· ·

Now, I recognize that the time we’re most likely to write · the webmaster is when something has bothered us. We couldn’t · find the information we were looking for. A link was broken. The · search engine wasn’t working. I am as guilty of anyone of · phrasing my anger in strident tones. I couldn’t tell you how · many times I’ve told webmasters that their site had lost my · business for their company and they were obviously overpaid.

· ·

In all that time, only one has written me back in an equally · nasty tone. My response was to consider learning who his manager · was, and forwarding the message, complaining that I’d been · treated horribly by this representative of their company.

· ·

Then I realized how unfair I was being. Why do I have the · right to be rude, but my correspondent does not? This seems to be · widespread in our culture. I’ve had several training session · in customer service. They’ve all spent a significant time · focusing on how to deal with the rude customer. Rude customers · are expected, and our job is to figure out how to defuse the · situation. We’re taught how to listen to the customer, and · try to appease the customer. This is all in the name of retaining · the customer.

· ·

The thing is, it works. I’ve found I get much better · customer service if I start the call, letter, or discussion · angry. You’ve wronged me! You’ve produced a horrible · product! You must calm me and appease me, no matter how · ridiculous my claims are!

· ·

In my experience, this approach works much better than just · calling up, acting like a rational adult, and calmly explaining · my problem. The only exception is when I get the extremely · hassled customer service representative who is just so grateful · that I’m not yelling at him that he’ll bend over · backwards to keep me on the phone. Otherwise, the next call could · be another yeller.

· ·

We seem to have taken this attitude to an extreme on the net. · I see language that almost no one uses during a telephone call. · I’ve seen absurd requests. "Your stupid ass file on the · ftp site broken. Recompile it and send me the fixed file when · it’s ready. You are all such idiots. I hope you go · bankrupt." I have to find a polite way to explain that the · file is indeed perfectly usable, it’s just that the user · needs to upgrade his version of Adobe · Acrobat Reader, which is, after all, free and available · everywhere.

· ·

Now this example shows the frustration that arises when the · user attacks full out over an issue that he could have corrected · himself. The problem is, these attacks create such a feeling of · frustration that when the webmaster discovers issues that were · legitimately the site’s fault, she could care less. Just · quite yelling at me, for heaven’s sake. I’m just the · backup webmaster! Mistakes happen! We have several thousand pages · that are updated by scores of people, and links will break, the · ftp server will be unavailable, and the site may not be organized · in the way that best suits you. Deal!

· ·

Which, of course, is not the best customer service attitude.

· ·

What I would suggest is a return to civility. If you find a · problem with a site, by all means, report it. Most people have no · idea how much work it takes to maintain a huge website, and all · the assistance you can give the webmaster is truly appreciated.

· ·

When you report the error, however, report it in the same way · you would if you were talking to someone you want to do something · for you. You don’t have to kowtow, but you could use a · polite tone. Write a business letter, not a flame. The webmaster · didn’t intend to ruin your day. The webmaster probably had · to throw up a correction to the page, answer some steaming hot · complaint letters, fix whatever issues they brought up, and then · attend a four hour planning meeting. The webmaster is a human · being who is probably overworked and doing a job that could keep · at least two more people occupied full time.

· ·

The net seems to be the incarnation of Hobbes' view · of the world: life is nasty, brutish, and the hub will crash · right when you need to find something. Perhaps we should inject a · little idealism into our interactions. Let’s move towards a · little more Rousseau. · Let’s establish a social contract, which includes the idea · that if you ask nicely, you shall receive, and if you flame, · don’t complain when there’s carbon on your dinner.

· ·

Be excellent to one another. I’ll thank you for it the · next time I have to be webmaster.

· ·
· ·

· back · · next · ·

· ·


·

· t h e   n e t   n e t ·   |   · t h e   g a l l e r y ·   |   · m u s i c ·   |   · f o o d   &   d r i n k ·
· w e b   s c h m e b ·   |   · b o o k s t o r e ·   |   · r e a d m e ·   |   · f e e d b a c k ·   |   · s u b m i t · · · ·